A top City investment bank has delivered a blunt verdict on Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves: for all the talk of national renewal, they left the economy no better off than they found it. For Britain’s small firms, the bill is landing as higher energy costs and fresh barriers to hiring and building.
In a research note published on Friday, Panmure Liberum said the former Prime Minister and Chancellor’s missteps on energy and housing meant it was “difficult to conclude” that the economy had improved in the two years since the general election.
“Progress in pockets of the economy have been stifled by new barriers to construction and employment leaving the UK, in our view, no better off than it was in July 2024,” chief economist Simon French wrote. He blamed a “new UK disease of prioritising luxury beliefs over hard-nosed competitiveness” for casting a shadow over the pair’s economic legacy.
The verdict cuts against the story both told on their way out. In a resignation speech defending his record, Starmer said he had left “this country in better shape than I found it” and that the “economy is stronger”. At last week’s Mansion House dinner, Reeves told City executives she had “restored economic credibility” and put the public finances on a firmer footing, echoing her earlier claim that the economy is not broken, just stuck.
For business owners, the detail matters more than the rhetoric. Housebuilding and energy were meant to be the twin engines of recovery. Labour’s manifesto promised to make Britain a “clean energy superpower” and cut household bills by £300 a year, alongside a pledge to build 1.5m homes over the parliament, a target that has since drifted out of reach.
Support authors and subscribe to content
This is premium stuff. Subscribe to read the entire article.
