Farmers and business owners have launched a High Court challenge against the government’s inheritance tax reforms, arguing that ministers acted unlawfully by failing to properly consult on changes that could reshape the future of family-run enterprises.
The two-day judicial review, which began on 17 March at the Royal Courts of Justice, will examine whether Chancellor Rachel Reeves breached established consultation principles when altering Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR).
The case has been brought by Cambridgeshire farmer Tom Martin, alongside his father George Martin and campaign group Farmers and Businesses for Fair Tax Relief. The claim is supported by law firm Collyer Bristow on behalf of advisory firm Alvarez & Marsal.
At the heart of the legal argument is the government’s Tax Consultation Framework, introduced in 2011, which commits ministers to conducting at least one formal public consultation on major tax reforms. The claimants argue that the inheritance tax changes, which affect how farms and businesses are passed down through generations, clearly meet that threshold but were introduced without meaningful engagement.
Speaking ahead of the hearing, Tom Martin said he had been forced to leave his farm work to pursue legal action, describing the case as a fight for fairness. Outside the court, campaigners gathered under banners reading “Keep Farms and Firms in the Family”, highlighting growing unrest across rural and business communities.
Support authors and subscribe to content
This is premium stuff. Subscribe to read the entire article.
